LinkedIn 50 InMail Blitz Plan + Sales Navigator vs Premium Decision
Use ‘Em or Lose ‘Em — End-of-Month Sprint
Date: 2026-03-26 Owner: Dmitri Sunshine Status: Execution-ready Purpose: Burn through 50 InMail credits before canceling Sales Navigator, then make an informed Premium vs Sales Nav decision for April onward Companion docs:
LinkedIn_SalesNav_RIA_Compliance_Consultant_Outreach_Guide.md,CPA_Firm_Cold_Outreach_Kit_v1.md,Estate_Attorney_Cold_Outreach_Kit_v1.md,Cyber_Insurance_Broker_Cold_Outreach_Kit_v1.md,Manual_Cold_Outreach_Cheat_Sheet.md
PART 1: THE CRITICAL FACT — USE YOUR CREDITS NOW
If you cancel Sales Navigator, ALL unused InMail credits are LOST. They do not transfer to LinkedIn Premium or a free account. There is no refund.
- Sales Navigator gives you 50 InMail credits/month (can accumulate up to 150 max)
- LinkedIn Premium Business gives you 15 InMail credits/month (can accumulate up to 45 max)
- Credits earned under Sales Nav vanish the moment you downgrade
Bottom line: You have 5 days (March 26-31) to use every InMail credit you’ve accumulated. This is a “use ‘em or lose ‘em” sprint.
PART 2: SALES NAVIGATOR VS PREMIUM — THE $100/MONTH DECISION
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LinkedIn Premium Business ($59.99/mo) | Sales Navigator Core ($119.99/mo) | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $59.99 | $119.99 | +$60/mo for Sales Nav |
| InMail credits/month | 15 | 50 | +35 more InMails |
| InMail accumulation cap | 45 (3 months) | 150 (3 months) | 3x higher cap |
| Advanced lead filters | Basic (industry, location, company size) | 50+ filters (seniority, function, years in role, technologies, intent signals) | Sales Nav is far superior |
| Boolean search | No | Yes | Major advantage |
| Lead/account lists | No | Yes (save leads, get alerts) | Major advantage |
| Spotlight filters | No | Yes (posted recently, changed jobs, viewed your profile) | Warm signal targeting |
| CRM integration | No | Yes (HubSpot, Salesforce) | Not relevant yet |
| Weekly connection requests | ~100/week (reputation-based) | ~100/week base, can organically reach 200-250/week with high SSI | Modest advantage |
| Who viewed your profile | 90 days | 90 days | Same |
| Unlimited people browsing | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Company insights | Basic | Advanced (growth signals, hiring trends, dept headcount) | Sales Nav is deeper |
The Honest Assessment
Arguments FOR keeping Sales Navigator ($120/mo):
- 50 InMails vs 15 — that’s 35 more shots per month at decision-makers who haven’t accepted your connection request
- The 50+ advanced filters are genuinely powerful for finding compliance consultants, attorneys, and CPA firm partners (Boolean title search is a killer feature)
- Spotlight filters surface “warm” prospects (recently posted, changed jobs, viewed your profile) — this is gold for timing outreach
- Lead lists with alerts mean you get notified when a prospect changes jobs, posts, or shows buying signals
Arguments FOR downgrading to Premium (60/mo to Apollo.io:
- You’re already maxing out weekly connection requests — that’s your primary channel, and Premium doesn’t limit those vs Sales Nav
- Apollo.io ($49-99/mo) gives you verified email addresses, phone numbers, and email sequencing — things Sales Nav literally cannot do
- Your GTM is shifting toward cold email + cold calling — Sales Nav doesn’t help with either of those
- 15 InMails/month is still plenty for high-value targets who didn’t accept connection requests
- The $60/mo savings goes directly to Apollo, which unlocks a DIFFERENT channel (cold email at scale)
- Apollo has 275M+ contacts with 91% claimed email accuracy — you can find the same people without Sales Nav’s filters
Arguments FOR canceling both and going Apollo-only ($49-99/mo):
- Apollo has its own LinkedIn integration and prospecting filters
- Cold email conversion rates (3-5% reply rate at 500-1,500 contacts/month) massively outscale LinkedIn InMail (which tops out at 50 touches/month)
- You’re paying for two lead-finding tools when one might suffice
- Apollo includes email sequencing, phone dialer, and intent data
The Recommendation
Downgrade to LinkedIn Premium Business (49/mo) = $109/mo (same as Sales Nav alone)
Here’s why:
- You keep 15 InMails/month for high-priority prospects (RIA compliance consultants, key referral partners)
- You keep unlimited connection requests (your primary LinkedIn channel)
- You ADD cold email capability (500-1,500 contacts/month via Apollo)
- You ADD phone numbers for cold calling (which you said you want to do)
- You ADD email sequencing (automate follow-ups)
- Net effect: you go from ~50 LinkedIn InMails + ~100 connection requests/week to ~15 InMails + ~100 connection requests/week + 500-1,500 cold emails/month + phone numbers for cold calling
The math: 50 InMails at ~10% response rate = 5 conversations. 500 cold emails at ~3% reply rate = 15 conversations. Apollo wins on volume by 3x for comparable cost.
Pro Tip: You can always re-subscribe to Sales Navigator for a single month when you need to build a fresh prospect list with advanced filters. Think of it as a “list-building sprint tool” rather than an always-on subscription. Build your lists on Sales Nav, export to Apollo for outreach, then cancel. Some people do this quarterly.
PART 3: THE 50 INMAIL BLITZ — MARCH 26-31
All templates below use a problem-first 4-line structure: Hook / Bridge / Mechanism / CTA. Every message is under 100 words. Use the Interactive Template Selector to pick variants and copy to clipboard.
Allocation by Segment
| Segment | InMails | Expected Responses (10-15%) |
|---|---|---|
| RIA Compliance Consultants | 10 | 1-2 responses |
| Title Companies / Escrow | 10 | 1-2 responses |
| Luxury Rehab / Treatment Centers | 8 | 1 response |
| Estate Attorneys | 8 | 1 response |
| MSP Partners | 5 | 1 response |
| Cyber Insurance Brokers | 5 | 1 response |
| Reserve (profile viewers / hot leads / referrals) | 4 | 1 response |
| TOTAL | 50 | 7-9 conversations |
InMail Templates by Segment
How to use: Select the variant that best matches the prospect’s situation. Open the Interactive Template Selector for a visual picker with copy-to-clipboard. Replace [Name], [Company], [Firm Name] before sending. Sign-off is always ”— Dmitri” (em dash, first name only).
SEGMENT 1: RIA Compliance Consultants (10 InMails)
Subject line options: reg s-p technical side | june 3 deadline | quick compliance question
Variant A — Timeline Hook
Subject: reg s-p technical side
Hi [Name] —
Reg S-P amendments deadline for smaller entities is June 3 — about 10 weeks out. The new requirements include a written incident response program, vendor oversight, and breach notification procedures that most compliance consultants aren’t equipped to implement technically.
That gap between “regulatory requirement” and “technical implementation” is where firms get caught.
We build the incident response programs, run the restore tests, and produce the documentation SEC examiners expect. 10 days, fixed fee.
Is this on your radar for your RIA clients?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~82
Variant B — Stat Hook
Subject: june 3 deadline
Hi [Name] —
The SEC just penalized a dual-registered RIA $325K — no MFA, no incident response framework, identity theft program unchanged since 2015. 8,500 individuals exposed across 13 member firms.
Most compliance consultants handle filings but not the technical cybersecurity layer. That’s the exact gap SEC examiners are now testing.
We handle the technical side: security baselines, restore testing, and Reg S-P documentation. Fixed scope, 10 days.
Worth a quick conversation about your RIA clients?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~83
Variant C — Gap Hook
Subject: quick compliance question
Hi [Name] —
Quick question: when your RIA clients ask about the technical implementation of Reg S-P — backup testing, incident response exercises, vendor security assessments — how are you handling that?
I ask because most compliance consultants handle the regulatory side but not the systems side. With the June 3 deadline approaching, that gap is becoming urgent.
We bridge it. Technical readiness assessment, 10 days, produces the documentation an SEC examiner needs.
Is this something your clients are asking about?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~85
Personalization notes: Reference their specific firm name, mention if you found them through a compliance association directory, note any mutual connections, reference any Reg S-P content they’ve posted.
SEGMENT 2: Title Companies / Escrow (10 InMails)
Subject line options: wire fraud procedures | alta compliance | ftc safeguards rule | quick question about [Company]
Variant A — Stat Hook
Subject: wire fraud procedures
Hi [Name] —
$500M+ in wire fraud losses hit the title industry last year. 60% of title companies were targeted in the past 12 months. Only 19% recovered all their funds.
CertifID protects individual wires. But your underwriter and the FTC aren’t asking “do you verify wires?” — they’re asking “do you have a documented security program?”
We help title companies answer that second question. 10-day assessment covering ALTA 4.2 and FTC Safeguards. Fixed fee.
Has [Company] had a security assessment recently?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~95
Variant B — Regulatory Hook
Subject: ftc safeguards rule
Hi [Name] —
The FTC considers settlement and escrow services “financial institutions” under the Safeguards Rule. That means a written information security program, risk assessments, and documented vendor oversight — with fines up to $100K per violation.
Most small title operations don’t realize this applies to them until a lender or underwriter asks.
We map ALTA 4.2 and FTC Safeguards requirements to a practical 10-day assessment built for small title companies.
Is this on your radar?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~89
Variant C — Case Study Hook
Subject: quick question about [Company]
Hi [Name] —
A 20-year escrow firm lost $1.5 million to wire fraud. Three fraudulent wires over 45 days. They went bankrupt.
The common factor in every case like this: undocumented security procedures and no formal baseline.
We help Colorado title companies document their security posture across ALTA 4.2 and FTC Safeguards requirements. 10 days, fixed fee, documented results.
Worth a quick conversation about [Company]‘s security posture?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~81
Variant D — Underwriter Pressure Hook
Subject: alta compliance
Hi [Name] —
ALTA Best Practices 4.2 got a significant update in 2025 — especially around wire transfer procedures and vendor vetting. Your underwriter is going to ask. Your cyber insurer already wants documentation.
The question isn’t whether you need a documented security program. It’s whether you have one when they ask.
We build exactly that. All 7 ALTA pillars, FTC Safeguards alignment, 10 days.
When is your next underwriter review or insurance renewal?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~85
Personalization notes: Reference ALTA Best Practices by name. Mention their specific underwriter if known. Colorado local angle is strong for this segment. Mention if you found them through LTAC (Land Title Association of Colorado).
SEGMENT 3: Luxury Rehab / Treatment Centers (8 InMails)
Subject line options: 42 cfr part 2 compliance | client discretion audit | hipaa + part 2 gap | quick question about [Company]
Variant A — Timeline Hook
Subject: 42 cfr part 2 compliance
Hi [Name] —
The 42 CFR Part 2 compliance deadline passed February 16. Part 2 is now aligned with HIPAA and enforced by OCR with civil money penalties. Anyone can file a complaint.
Most treatment centers haven’t updated their IT systems to reflect the new requirements — especially around consent management, re-disclosure controls, and breach notification.
We run HIPAA + Part 2 security assessments designed for treatment facilities. 10 days, fixed fee, documented results.
Is this on your radar?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~87
Variant B — Stat Hook
Subject: hipaa + part 2 gap
Hi [Name] —
OCR had 21 enforcement actions in 2025 — second-highest year ever. 46% of healthcare organizations have no incident response plan. The proposed HIPAA Security Rule overhaul eliminates the “addressable” distinction — everything becomes mandatory.
For treatment centers handling substance use disorder records, the stakes are doubled: HIPAA plus 42 CFR Part 2 compliance.
We help facilities close both gaps in one engagement. 10 days, fixed fee.
Worth a quick conversation?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~84
Variant C — Discretion Hook
Subject: client discretion audit
Hi [Name] —
Your clients pay $50K+/month for privacy. They’re executives, public figures, people whose careers depend on discretion.
But can your IT systems deliver on that promise? Who has access to client records? Are communications encrypted? Is your network segmented? Could a disgruntled employee exfiltrate the client list?
We run a discretion-focused security assessment for luxury treatment facilities — covering HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and the privacy controls your clients expect.
Has [Company] assessed this recently?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~90
Variant D — Dual Regulation Hook
Subject: quick question about [Company]
Hi [Name] —
Treatment centers face a dual compliance burden most facilities haven’t addressed: HIPAA for health information, plus 42 CFR Part 2 for substance use disorder records — which is stricter. Part 2 requires special consent, prohibits re-disclosure, and limits use in legal proceedings.
Since February, OCR can enforce Part 2 with civil penalties. Most facilities’ IT systems aren’t configured for this.
We assess both in one 10-day engagement. Fixed fee, practical recommendations.
Is this something [Company] has looked at?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~92
Personalization notes: Tone must be professional, compliance-focused, empathetic. Lead with regulatory compliance and business protection. Never reference specific clients or patient scenarios. Reference their accreditation (Joint Commission) if applicable.
SEGMENT 4: Estate Attorneys (8 InMails)
Subject line options: malpractice renewal | client data protection | quick question about [Firm Name]
Variant A — Timeline Hook
Subject: malpractice renewal
Hi [Name] —
Malpractice carriers are adding cybersecurity questions to renewal questionnaires this year. ABA Rule 1.6(c) requires “reasonable efforts” to protect client data — but most estate planning firms can’t document what those efforts actually are.
Trust documents contain SSNs, financial accounts, and beneficiary designations. That’s everything needed for identity theft if it leaks.
We run a focused data protection review that produces exactly the documentation your carrier wants to see. 5-7 days, fixed fee.
Is this relevant for [Firm Name]?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~93
Variant B — Stat Hook
Subject: client data protection
Hi [Name] —
66% of law firms have no incident response plan. Over 200 ransomware attacks targeted law firms in the past year. INC Ransom group alone claimed 20 firms in early 2026.
Estate planning firms are high-value targets — the client files contain SSNs, financial accounts, medical conditions, and beneficiary information all in one place.
We help firms document “reasonable efforts” under Rule 1.6(c) before it becomes an exam finding or a breach. 5-7 day assessment, fixed fee.
Has [Firm Name] looked at this recently?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~96
Variant C — Case Hook
Subject: quick question about [Firm Name]
Hi [Name] —
The ABA TechReport found that 66% of law firms still lack an incident response plan. Meanwhile, malpractice carriers are tightening renewal requirements around cybersecurity controls — especially for firms holding sensitive client financial data.
For estate planning firms, the stakes are higher. One breach exposes everything: SSNs, trust details, beneficiary designations.
We verify that your firm can demonstrate “reasonable efforts” under ABA 1.6(c). Fixed fee, documented results.
Worth a quick conversation?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~87
Personalization notes: Reference their specific practice areas (trusts & estates, elder law, wealth transfer). Mention Colorado Bar Association events if applicable. Reference malpractice carrier by name if known.
SEGMENT 5: MSP Partners (5 InMails)
Subject line options: non-competing assessment work | remediation referrals | quick partnership idea
Variant A — Partnership Hook
Subject: non-competing assessment work
Hi [Name] —
Almost every security assessment we run uncovers remediation work that’s perfect for an MSP — patching gaps, backup configuration issues, access control fixes, endpoint hardening.
We do the assessment. You do the remediation. No overlap, clean handoff, and your client gets a documented security baseline.
15% referral fee on any client that comes your way from our assessments.
Worth a quick call to see if there’s a fit?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~75
Variant B — Revenue Hook
Subject: remediation referrals
Hi [Name] —
We run 10-day security assessments for SMBs and nonprofits. Every assessment produces a prioritized 30/60/90 remediation plan — pre-qualified implementation work that needs an MSP.
We don’t do remediation. We refer it. 15% referral fee, pre-scoped projects, and a client who already understands what needs fixing.
Looking for 2-3 MSP partners in the Colorado market.
Is this something that would interest your team?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~78
Variant C — Gap Hook
Subject: quick partnership idea
Hi [Name] —
Quick question: when was the last real restore test you ran for your clients? Not “we have backups” — an actual recovery to bare metal or clean VM with documented results.
Most MSPs don’t have time for this. We do it as part of a 10-day resilience assessment — and the findings always generate remediation work for the MSP.
Non-competing, clean handoff. Interested in exploring a referral partnership?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~78
Personalization notes: Reference their specific service areas (managed IT, cloud, security). Mention their target verticals if visible. Note team size if relevant. Emphasize non-competing and referral revenue.
SEGMENT 6: Cyber Insurance Brokers (5 InMails)
Subject line options: loss control partner | insurance readiness gap | your smb policyholders
Variant A — Stat Hook
Subject: insurance readiness gap
Hi [Name] —
41% of cyber insurance applications get denied on first submission. 82% of denied claims involved organizations without MFA. Your SMB policyholders are probably hitting the same wall.
The gap: they don’t know what they need to fix, and their IT person can’t produce the documentation carriers want to see.
We bridge that gap. 10-day security assessment that produces exactly what underwriters are asking for.
Would a loss control partnership be useful for your book of business?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~88
Variant B — Loss Control Hook
Subject: loss control partner
Hi [Name] —
What if your SMB policyholders could pass their cyber insurance application on the first try?
We run security assessments that produce the exact documentation carriers require — MFA verification, incident response plans, backup testing results, endpoint protection evidence.
For you, it means fewer denials, better retention, and a loss control resource you can offer proactively.
Is this something you’d want for your book of business?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~75
Variant C — Renewal Hook
Subject: your smb policyholders
Hi [Name] —
The most common reason SMBs get denied on cyber insurance: they can’t prove MFA is enforced (not just “available”), have no documented incident response plan, and backup testing hasn’t happened.
We help your insureds close those gaps before renewal. Fixed-fee assessment, 10 days, produces carrier-ready documentation.
Fewer denials for your clients, fewer headaches for you.
Worth a quick conversation about how this could work?
— Dmitri
Word count: ~79
Personalization notes: Reference the specific carriers they work with if visible (Coalition, Cowbell, etc.). Position as loss control partner, not vendor. Mention any recent cyber insurance market trends.
Daily Execution Schedule (March 26-31)
| Day | Date | InMails to Send | Segments | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu | Mar 26 | 10 | 4 RIA Compliance + 3 Title/Escrow + 3 Luxury Rehab | Start with highest-urgency segments. Use the Sales Nav warm-up filters (recently posted, profile viewers) to pick the warmest ones first. |
| Fri | Mar 27 | 10 | 3 RIA Compliance + 3 Title/Escrow + 2 Estate Attorneys + 2 Luxury Rehab | Target people who are active on Fridays (check “posted in last 30 days” filter). |
| Sat | Mar 28 | 5 | 2 MSPs + 2 Cyber Insurance Brokers + 1 Estate Attorney | Lighter day. Queue these up but send Monday AM if weekend InMail performance is poor. |
| Mon | Mar 30 | 15 | 3 RIA Compliance + 4 Title/Escrow + 3 Estate Attorneys + 3 MSPs + 2 Cyber Insurance Brokers | Biggest push day. Monday AM InMails get highest open rates. |
| Tue | Mar 31 | 10 | Reserve (4) + remaining credits to best-fit prospects across all segments + hot leads / profile viewers | Last day. Use remaining credits on anyone who viewed your profile, engaged with content, or was referred. |
Pro Tip: LinkedIn data shows InMails sent Tuesday-Thursday between 8-10 AM local time get the highest open rates. Monday mornings are also strong. Avoid Friday afternoon and weekends for business prospects. Schedule your sends accordingly. Use the Interactive Template Selector to pick and copy templates faster.
PART 4: TRACKING & FOLLOW-UP
Create a Simple Tracker
For each InMail sent, log in your ClickUp or a spreadsheet:
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Name | Who you sent to |
| Company | Their firm |
| Segment | RIA / Attorney / MSP / Broker / Other |
| Date Sent | When you sent the InMail |
| Subject Line | Which template you used |
| Personalization | What you customized |
| Status | Sent / Opened / Replied / Meeting Booked / No Response |
| Follow-up Date | When to follow up (7-10 days after send) |
| Notes | Any context for the follow-up |
Follow-Up Protocol
Since you’re potentially canceling Sales Nav, you’ll lose InMail follow-up capability. Plan B:
- For anyone who accepts your connection request (even if they don’t reply to InMail): follow up via regular LinkedIn message using the conversation sequences from your RIA Compliance Consultant guide
- For anyone who replies to InMail: immediately move the conversation to regular messaging or email
- For no-response after 10 days: send ONE follow-up via regular LinkedIn message (if connected) or leave it (if not connected)
Pro Tip: InMail has a unique advantage — if the recipient replies within 90 days, LinkedIn REFUNDS the InMail credit. So every response you get actually gives you a credit back. This means your 50 InMails could effectively become 55-60 if you get a 10-15% response rate. Unfortunately, this only matters if you’re keeping Sales Nav. Since you’re likely downgrading, just focus on quality over credit conservation.
PART 5: TRANSITION PLAN — MOVING TO PREMIUM + APOLLO
Before You Cancel Sales Navigator (Do This First!)
- Use all InMail credits (this document’s blitz plan)
- Export all saved lead lists — download CSVs from every lead list you’ve built
- Screenshot all saved searches — you’ll lose access to these filters
- Export all account lists — same as leads
- Note any prospects in active conversations — you’ll keep the message thread as a connection, but lose Sales Nav insights
- Download any Sales Nav notes you’ve added to leads
- Check your billing cycle — cancel AFTER your renewal date to keep access for the full paid period
Apollo.io Setup Priorities (Week 1 After Switch)
- Import your exported Sales Nav lead lists into Apollo
- Set up your ICP filters in Apollo (mirror your Sales Nav saved searches)
- Connect your solanashq.com email for cold outreach (NOT solanasis.com — protect your primary domain)
- Build your first 3 sequences (RIA Compliance Consultants, Estate Attorneys, MSPs)
- Start with 5-10 cold emails/day and scale up as domain warms
PART 6: QUICK-REFERENCE — WHAT GOES WHERE
| Channel | Tool | Volume | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn connection requests | LinkedIn Premium | 100/week | Warm prospecting, building network |
| LinkedIn InMail | LinkedIn Premium | 15/month | High-value targets who won’t accept connections |
| LinkedIn messaging | LinkedIn Premium | Unlimited (to connections) | Nurturing accepted connections |
| Cold email sequences | Apollo.io | 500-1,500/month | Volume outreach, ICP segments |
| Cold calling | Apollo.io (phone numbers) | As many as you want | Direct decision-maker contact |
| Lead research | Apollo.io + LinkedIn Premium | Unlimited | Finding contact info, company data |
APPENDIX A: INMAIL BEST PRACTICES CHEAT SHEET
- Subject lines with questions get 2-3x higher open rates — always lead with curiosity
- Keep InMails under 150 words — shorter = higher response rate
- Personalize the first line — mention their firm, a post they wrote, a mutual connection, or their specific practice area
- One clear CTA — “Would a 15-minute call make sense?” (not multiple asks)
- Don’t attach anything — link to resources instead
- Send Tue-Thu, 8-10 AM recipient’s local time — highest open rates
- No InMail on weekends for business prospects
- If they respond, you get the credit back — so optimize for response-worthy messages
- Track everything — you need to know which segments and templates perform best for when you switch to Apollo cold email
APPENDIX B: CONNECTION REQUEST SCRIPTS (TO USE ALONGSIDE INMAIL)
While blitzing InMails, also keep sending connection requests to different prospects in the same segments. This creates a two-pronged approach. Keep all requests under 300 characters.
RIA Compliance Consultants:
Hi [Name] — I’ve been working with RIAs on the technical side of Reg S-P compliance (backup restore testing, incident response verification). Seems like we serve the same clients from different angles. Would love to connect.
Estate Attorneys:
Hi [Name] — fellow Colorado professional here. We help estate planning firms demonstrate “reasonable efforts” under ABA Rule 1.6(c) for client data protection. Thought there might be natural overlap with your practice.
MSPs:
Hi [Name] — quick question: when was your last real restore test for your clients (not just “we have backups”)? We might be able to send you some remediation work.
Cyber Insurance Brokers:
Hi [Name] — we help SMBs meet the cybersecurity requirements on their insurance renewal questionnaires. Could be a useful resource for your book of business. Would love to connect.
Title Companies / Escrow — Local Angle:
Hi [Name] — fellow Colorado professional here. I work with title companies on security and ALTA compliance. Saw you’re at [Company] and thought it’d be worth connecting.
Title Companies / Escrow — Industry Angle:
Hi [Name] — the wire fraud data for title companies this year is sobering. I help title operations document their security posture. Would love to connect and share what we’re seeing.
Luxury Rehab / Treatment Centers — Compliance Angle:
Hi [Name] — I work with treatment facilities on HIPAA and 42 CFR Part 2 IT compliance. Noticed [Facility] and thought there might be some overlap. Would love to connect.
Luxury Rehab / Treatment Centers — Privacy Angle:
Hi [Name] — I focus on the IT security side of client privacy for residential treatment facilities. Thought it’d be worth connecting with others in the behavioral health space.